You measured the mass of three different volumes of unknown liquid [Free] B108

You measured the mass of three different volumes of unknown liquid [Free] B108

You measured the mass of three different volumes of unknown liquid. What was the total mass of the graduated cylinder and the unknown liquid for the three measurements? Choose the masses that are closest to the observed values. 75.000g,85.000g,95.300g 75.000g,86.100g,97.200g 10.000g,20.000g,30.000g 86.100g,97.200g,108.300g

Mass of Graduated Cylinder and Liquid | Complete Measurement Guide

🔬 You measured the mass of three different volumes of unknown liquid. What was the total mass of the graduated cylinder and the unknown liquid for the three measurements?

📌 Options Provided:

  • 75.000 g, 85.000 g, 95.300 g
  • 75.000 g, 86.100 g, 97.200 g ✅
  • 10.000 g, 20.000 g, 30.000 g
  • 86.100 g, 97.200 g, 108.300 g
Correct Answer: 75.000 g, 86.100 g, 97.200 g
These values represent a consistent increase in mass with increasing liquid volume. This is a strong indicator of accurate lab technique and a liquid with constant density.

🧪 Full Detailed Explanation

When conducting laboratory measurements involving an unknown liquid, it’s essential to follow a systematic approach to achieve accuracy and repeatability. This type of experiment typically involves using a graduated cylinder to measure liquid volume and a digital or analytical balance to record mass.

In this case, the mass of the graduated cylinder with three different volumes of an unknown liquid is recorded. The goal is to determine which set of values reflects real, consistent, and logically increasing measurements.

🔹 Understanding the Data

To identify the correct set of values, consider what each measurement represents:

  • The first value is typically the mass of the empty graduated cylinder.
  • The second and third values include the cylinder plus added volumes of liquid.

So, we apply this idea:

Mass by Difference Formula:
Mass of liquid = (Mass of cylinder + liquid) - (Mass of empty cylinder)

🔹 Applying to the Correct Answer

From the selected option (75.000 g, 86.100 g, 97.200 g), we analyze the differences:

  • 86.100 g − 75.000 g = 11.100 g
  • 97.200 g − 86.100 g = 11.100 g

This shows a consistent increase in mass (11.100 g), which suggests that the same volume of liquid was added each time and that the liquid has a constant density. These are key indicators of precise measurement and scientific integrity.

🔹 Why Other Options Are Incorrect

Let’s briefly review the shortcomings of other options:

  • Option 1: 85.000 g − 75.000 g = 10.000 g, 95.300 g − 85.000 g = 10.300 g → not consistent.
  • Option 3: 10.000 g, 20.000 g, 30.000 g → too low; indicates either error or an unrealistic empty cylinder mass.
  • Option 4: Suggests an empty cylinder mass of 86.100 g → not realistic for typical labware.

📏 Practical Importance of Consistency

In any measurement-based experiment, consistency plays a critical role in validating results. The fact that the mass increases consistently with each volume indicates that:

  • The balance was correctly zeroed.
  • The same cylinder was used throughout.
  • No spillage or measurement error occurred during transfers.

This consistency makes the data set (75.000 g, 86.100 g, 97.200 g) not just correct—but scientifically reliable.

📊 Real-World Application

Understanding this principle has wide applications:

  • Chemistry labs for solution preparation and stoichiometry.
  • Pharmaceuticals for measuring precise liquid ingredients.
  • Environmental science for measuring pollutants in liquid samples.
  • Food science for evaluating concentrations in liquids like juices or extracts.

Whether in an academic lab or an industrial environment, mass-by-difference measurements form the backbone of countless procedures.

🧠 Final Thoughts

When analyzing measurement data:

  • Always look for patterns and consistency.
  • Be aware of realistic values based on apparatus used.
  • Confirm that mass increases proportionally with volume.

These fundamental practices ensure scientific accuracy and enable reliable experimentation.

Summary: The correct mass readings based on logical consistency, scientific expectation, and laboratory norms are: 75.000 g, 86.100 g, 97.200 g.

In laboratory environments, this type of exercise teaches essential measurement principles. The progression of mass values illustrates the importance of consistency and scientific reasoning. Students learn to verify data patterns and justify conclusions based on evidence.

Moreover, such exercises lay the groundwork for advanced topics, such as chemical titration, spectrometry calibration, and pharmaceutical formulation, where mass accuracy is paramount. By understanding these basics, learners are better prepared for professional scientific challenges.

In summary, this measurement set is not just a correct answer—it is a reflection of good scientific practice, critical thinking, and attention to detail. These are the qualities that elevate simple experiments into foundational learning experiences that shape future discovery.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *